Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif bagi Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru IPA dalam Penyusunan LKPD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52250/dbe.v10i2.1077Keywords:
Generatif Kecerdasan Buatan, GenAI, literasi, pendidikan sains, TPACKAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) has experienced rapid development in the field of education and learning. The use of Gen AI by teachers, especially science teachers, can improve Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) competencies that are currently demanded by teachers. This study aims to develop Student Worksheets (LKPD) based on Gen AI to evaluate the assessment of student abilities by science teachers in the context of science education. A qualitative study design was chosen to explore science teachers' experiences of using Gen AI in preparing LKPD. A total of 30 teachers were given an understanding of the use of the Gen AI application through training activities and coaching visits that were part of the lecturer community service activities. The main objective was to analyze several characteristics of the material and the preparation of LKPD with generative artificial intelligence. The preparation of LKPD GenAI is based on four main activities: (1) hypothesis formation, (2) asking GenAI, (3) discussion, and (4) reflection. All stages are linked to the scientific literacy framework and TPACK aspects. The results of the program showed that respondents agreed with the use of GenAI such as ChatGPT for current learning activities. Science teachers' TPACK competencies can improve during the process of developing student worksheets (LKPD) through group discussions. Teachers are able to select statements from ChatGPT based on concepts they already understand. Teachers also gain new knowledge from ChatGPT statements about the concepts they are asking about. Therefore, Gen AI can be used by teachers to optimize the learning process.
Keyword: generative artificial intelligence, GenAI, literacy, science education, TPACK.
Abstrak
Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif (Gen AI) telah mengalami perkembangan pesat pada bidang pendidikan dan pembelajaran. Penggunaan Gen AI oleh guru khususnya guru IPA dapat memberikan peningkatan kompetensi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) yang menjadi tuntutan guru saat ini. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menyusunan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) berdasarkan Gen AI untuk mengevaluasi penilaian kemampuan siswa oleh guru IPA dalam konteks pendidikan sains. Desain studi kualitatif dipilih untuk mengeksplorasi pengalaman guru IPA tentang penggunaan Gen AI dalam penyusunan LKPD. Sebanyak 30 guru diberikan pemahaman tentang penggunaan aplikasi Gen AI melalui kegiatan diklat dan kunjungan pembinaan yang menjadi bagian dari kegiatan pengabdian dosen. Tujuan utamanya adalah untuk menganalisis beberapa karakteristik materi dan penyusunan LKPD dengan kecerdasan buatan generatif. Penyusunan LKPD GenAI didasarkan pada empat aktivitas utama: (1) pembuatan hipotesis, (2) bertanya kepada GenAI, (3) diskusi, dan (4) refleksi. Seluruh tahapan dikaitkan dengan kerangka literasi sains dan aspek TPACK. Hasil program menunjukkan bahwa responden setuju penggunaan GenAI seperti ChatGPT untuk kegiatan pembelajaran saat ini. Kompetensi TPACK guru IPA dapat mengalami peningkatan selama proses penyusunan LKPD melalui proses diskusi kelompok. Guru mampu menyeleksi pernyataan dari ChatGPT dengan konsep yang telah mereka pahami. Guru juga mendapatkan pengetahuan baru dari pernyataan ChatGPT tentang konsep-konsep yang mereka tanyakan. Sehingga, Gen AI dapat digunakan oleh guru untuk mengoptimalkan proses pembelajaran.
Kata kunci: Generatif Kecerdasan Buatan, GenAI, literasi, pendidikan sains, TPACK.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2021). Pembelajaran literasi: Strategi meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika, sains, membaca, dan menulis. Bumi Aksara.
Abou Hashish, E. A., & Alnajjar, H. (2024). Digital proficiency: assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills in digital transformation, health literacy, and artificial intelligence among university nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 508.
Akpan, I. J., Kobara, Y. M., Owolabi, J., Akpan, A. A., & Offodile, O. F. (2025). Conversational and generative artificial intelligence and human–chatbot interaction in education and research. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32(3), 1251–1281.
Almogren, A. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Dahri, N. A. (2024). Integrated technological approaches to academic success: Mobile learning, social media, and AI in higher education. IEEE Access.
Andriyani, W., Natsir, F., Asri, Y. N., Hidayat, M. S., Yati, Y., Afandi, I. R., Diningrat, M. S. M., Rahmatulloh, A., Akbari, F., & Wahyuningtyas, I. (2024). Ai Generatif Dan Mutu Pendidikan. Penerbit Widina.
Arantes, J. (2024). Understanding Intersections Between GenAI and Pre-Service Teacher Education: What Do We Need to Understand About the Changing Face of Truth in Science Education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–12.
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. J. (2024). The rapid adoption of generative AI. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bozinovski, S. (2020). Reminder of the first paper on transfer learning in neural networks, 1976. Informatica, 44(3).
Bustos, J. P., & Soria, L. L. (2024). Generative AI Application Integration Patterns: Integrate large language models into your applications. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: The ChatGPT effect. Taylor & Francis.
Chen, C. (2024). Lanyu: leverage generative artificial intelligence in assisting foreign language learning.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203.
Choi, Y.-S., & Chung, J.-I. (2025). Analysis of practical characteristics in simulated elementary science lessons earth and space using ChatGPT. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 46(1), 78–95.
Dermawan, R. D., & Herdianto, H. (2024). Meningkatkan Kinerja Output ChatGPT Melalui Teknik Prompt Engineering Yang Dapat Dikustomisasi. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 10646–10664.
Dewi, H. R., Qudratuddarsi, H., Ningthias, D. P., & Cinthami, R. D. D. (2024). The Current Update of ChatGPT Roles in Science Experiment: A Systemic Literature Review. Saqbe: Jurnal Sains Dan Pembelajarannya, 1(2), 74–85.
Dewi, P. S. (2016). Perspektif guru sebagai implementasi pembelajaran inkuiri terbuka dan inkuiri terbimbing terhadap sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran sains. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(2), 179–186.
Diktiristek, D. (2024). Panduan penggunaan generative artificial intelligence (genai) pada pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi.
Dimas, D., Alvindi, A., Khoirunnisa, T., Yani, R., Pardamean, P., & Simanjuntak, K. (2025). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Difficulties of ChatGPT as a Tool for Planning The Learning Process. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 5906–5922.
Dwihadiah, D., Gerungan, A., & Purba, H. (2024). Penggunaan ChatGPT di kalangan mahasiswa dan dosen perguruan tinggi Indonesia. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(2), 130–145.
Ernawati, E., & Safitri, R. (2017). Analisis kesulitan guru dalam merancang rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran mata pelajaran fisika berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 di kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 5(2), 49–56.
Fajriati, A., Wisroni, W., & Handrianto, C. (2024). Pemanfaatan teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam pembelajaran berbasis peserta didik di era digital. WAHANA PEDAGOGIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 71–85.
Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.
Ikhlas, M., Yasmin, L., & Muharramah, D. (2025). Mempersiapkan Pendidik Masa Depan di Era Kecerdasan Buatan: Pengalaman Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dengan Aplikasi Generatif AI: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 5190–5199.
Indriani, A., Trisnawati, R., Asriani, R. W., & Ningsih, R. (2024). Analisis potensi chat gpt dalam mendukung pembelajaran pai: perspektif kajian literatur. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 11598–11608.
Ishmuradova, I. I., Zhdanov, S. P., Kondrashev, S. V, Erokhova, N. S., Grishnova, E. E., & Volosova, N. Y. (2025). Pre-service science teachers’ perception on using generative artificial intelligence in science education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep579.
Ja’faruddin, J., Nasrullah, N., Ashari, N. W., Khaerati, K., & Putri, F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelegence (Gen-AI) dalam Pembelajaran pada Guru-Guru Di Kabupaten Sidrap. Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 3(2), 330–336.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537–550.
Laak, K.-J., Abdelghani, R., & Aru, J. (2024). Personalisation is not guaranteed: The challenges of using generative AI for personalised learning. International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning, 40–49.
Lee, G.-G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1643–1660.
Manuaba, I. B. K., Erwanto, D., Judijanto, L., Harto, B., Sa’dianoor, H., Supartha, I. K. D. G., Wahyudi, F., Pandia, M., & Kelvin, K. (2024). TEKNOLOGI ChatGPT: Pengetahuan Dasar dan Pemanfaatan kombinasi keahlian dengan ChatGPT di berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1(1), 1–16.
Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J. K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for teachers: Practical examples for utilizing artificial intelligence for educational purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10(3), 200–205.
Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N., & Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100277.
Nisa, Z. (2025). Optimalisasi Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Artifical Intellegence untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas dan Hasil Belajar. Novara: Nusantara Education and Innovation Journal, 2(2), 97–109.
Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Idroes, G. M., Zahriah, Z., Paristiowati, M., Emran, T. Bin, Ilyas, M., & Idroes, R. (2024). Embrace, don’t avoid: Reimagining higher education with generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 2(2), 81–90.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) Publication, 1–9. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html
Peliza, R. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan ChatGPT sebagai Alat Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Mahasiswa. REMIK: Riset Dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer, 8(4), 1220–1229.
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2024). How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 25701.
Powell, W., & Courchesne, S. (2024). Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PloS One, 19(6), e0305337.
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34–42.
Putra, M. R. J. H., Caska, M. S., Gimin, M. P., & Henny Indrawati, S. P. (2025). Implementasi Artificial Intelligence Dalam Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Disatuan Pendidikan. PT. Nas Media Indonesia.
Rahayu, S. (2017). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): Integrasi ICT dalam Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA IX, 9, 1–14.
Ramnarain, U. (2024). Pedagogical beliefs of South African physics teachers for inquiry approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2727(1), 12029.
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 545–558). Routledge.
Sediyono, E., Hasibuan, Z. A., Setyawan, I., Harahap, E. P., & Darmawan, A. (2022). Analisa sistematis manajemen pengetahuan digital aplikasi berbasis kecerdasan buatan di universitas. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 3(2), 97–109.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sirait, R. A., & Dewi, E. Y. (2024). Peran teknologi pembelajaran pada desain pembelajaran. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Kristen Dan Katolik, 2(4), 232–242.
Sisephaputra, B., Judijanto, L., Apriyanto, A., Lukman, L., Migunani, M., Umar, N., Sepriano, S., Khairunnisa, K., & Wati, D. C. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): Pengetahuan Dasar GenAI Beserta Penerapannya. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.
Sitorus, M., & Murti, M. D. F. (2024). Analisis pengaruh penggunaan artificial intelligence pada pembelajaran di cyber university. Innotech: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 90–101.
States, N. L. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
Subiyantoro, S., Degeng, I. N. S., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of ai-powered chatbots (chat gpt) on education: A qualitative study on benefits and drawbacks. Jurnal Pekommas, 8(2), 157–168.
Sudrajat, D., Permatasari, R. D., Wijaya, I. M. S., Setyawan, A. E., & Rahayu, N. (2023). Pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan sebagai upaya pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis multimedia. Jurnal Kridatama Sains Dan Teknologi, 5(02), 590–598.
Sulianta, F. (2024). Chat GPT-Memberdayakan Large Language Model untuk Berbagai Kebutuhan. Feri Sulianta.
Suparya, I. K., Suastra, I. W., & Arnyana, I. B. P. (2022). Rendahnya literasi sains: faktor penyebab dan alternatif solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153–166.
Taufik, I., & Rindaningsih, I. (2024). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Guru Sebagai Sumber Daya Manusia Bidang Pendidikan di Era Kecerdasan Buatan (AI). Management of Education: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 63–69.
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 333–355.
Ulpiana, T. (2025). Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Teknologi Pendidikan: Tren dan Inovasi Terbaru. Al-Kamal: Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Technology, 1(1), 10–27.
Verma, G., Campbell, T., Melville, W., & Park, B.-Y. (2023). Navigating opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence: ChatGPT and generative models in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(8), 793–798.
Yang, X., Wang, Q., & Lyu, J. (2024). Assessing ChatGPT’s educational capabilities and application potential. ECNU Review of Education, 7(3), 699–713.
Yasin, M., Judijanto, L., Andrini, V. S., Patriasih, R., Hutami, T. S., Hasni, H., Arisa, M. F., Asriningsih, T. M., Saifuddin, M., & Hariyono, H. (2024). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi: Teori dan Implementasi. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Surya Gumilar, Irma Fitria Amalia, De Budi Irwan Taofik, Iing Mustain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
